Pasture is full of shit!

 

 

 

Louis Pasteur was the son of peasants, his father a tanner by trade. As a young high school boy Pasteur never stood out amongst his peers, preferring instead to go fishing than going to class (sort a make you want to root for the guy). Even when he went on to study at the Ecole Normale Superieure, and though he worked hard during his student days he was not considered exceptional in any way at chemistry.

According to His-story, Pasteur is credited with founding the science of microbiology  and to have postulated, making it gospel that most infectious diseases are caused by alien microorganisms invading the system from outside the body. This is known as the “germ theory” of disease.

 

 

He is also credited as the inventor of pasteurization, where products are heated to a certain level of temperature to kill harmful bacteria, making them “safe” to consume. Pasteurization made brewing a more scientific procedure and showed brewers how to culture the “right organisms” for good beer. He demonstrated to the wine industry that if wine is gently heated to sixty degrees Celsius for a short time, the growth of harmful bacteria is prevented and the wine does not go sour in bottles or barrels. Thus, Pasteur was not only a friend of the legal drug pushers –doctors, but also a friend of Joe 6 pack and fans and hooligans who attend sporting events around the globe.

 

 

His-story also attributed the development of vaccines to Louis Pasteur. In 1867, a laboratory was established for his discovery of the rabies vaccine, using public funds. It became known as the Pasteur Institute and was headed by the man until his death in 1888.

 


I won’t get into a long list of “scientific discoveries” Louis Pasteur came up with, because my main point is his relevancy hinging on the “germ theory” and how it has impacts modern medicine and science. Now if you go back and read the previous post, I had alluded to the zealotry that goes on in Religion and the current one in medicine. I will state here emphatically that the germ theory is false, and that chronic and acute illness is practically always due to bad diet or excessive abusive of the wrong kinds of foods and or abuse of pharmaceuticals, whether street, or prescription. The germs present in an ill person is only there as scavengers of dead and wasted tissues and foods, and are never there as causes of the disease.

The stupid belief that “germs” ( a made up word which is par for science) cause disease and must be controlled or eliminated before it can be cured is utter nonsense on the level of -Jesus walking on water and George Bush is a born again Christian.

Pasteur’s ideas and claims to fame are based on the plagiarized works of one Antoine Bechamp, on bad science and on a fraudulent basis on which the germ theory rests.


According to His-story and Our-story, as they relate to the causes of disease that were held by leading physicians before Pasteur’s notorious “germ theory”, you will find Pasteur discovered nothing, and that he deliberately stole and  falsified another man’s work.

“Geronimo Fracastorio (an Italian poet and physician, 1483 – 1553) of Verona, published a work (De Contagionibus et Contagiosis Morbis, et eorum Curatione) in Venice in 1546 which contained the first statement of the true nature of contagion, infection, or disease organisms, and of the modes of transmission of infectious disease. He divided diseases into those, which infect by immediate contact, through intermediate agents, and at a distance through the air. Organisms, which cause disease, called seminaria contagionum; he supposed to be of the nature of viscous or glutinous matter, similar to the colloidal states of substances described by modern physical chemists. These particles, too small to be seen, were capable of reproduction in appropriate media, and became pathogenic through the action of animal heat. Thus Fracastorio, in the middle of the sixteenth century, gave us an outline of morbid processes in terms of microbiology.”

–F. Harrison, Principal Professor of Bacteriology at Macdonald College Quebec, Canada, in an Historical Review of Microbiology,

 

He continues:

M. A. Plenciz, a Viennese physician, who in 1762 published a germ theory of infectious diseases, maintained that “there was a special organism by which each infectious disease was produced, that micro-organisms were capable of reproduction outside of the body, and that they might be conveyed from place to place by the air.”

This is Pasteur’s great “germ theory” in print over a century before Pasteur thought of it (?), or published it as his own!

Here also, is a quote from the greatest nurse in Anglo-Saxon his-Story, Florence Nightingale, who attacked the idea in 1860, over 17 years before Pasteur’s theory became his.

 Diseases are not individuals arranged in classes, like cats and dogs, but conditions growing out of one another. Is it not living in a continual mistake to look upon diseases as we do now as separate entities, which must exist, like cats and dogs, instead of looking upon them as conditions, like a dirty and a clean condition, and just as much under our control; or rather as the reactions of kindly nature, against the conditions in which we have placed ourselves? I was brought up to believe that smallpox, for instance, was a thing of which there was once a first specimen in the world which went on propagating itself, in a perpetual chain of descent, just as there was a first dog, (or a first pair of dogs) and that smallpox would not begin itself, any more than a new dog would begin without there having been a parent dog.

Since then I have seen with my own eyes and smelled with my own nose smallpox growing up in first specimens, either in closed rooms or in overcrowded wards, where it could not by any possibility have been ‘caught’, but must have begun. I have seen diseases begin, grow up, and pass into one another. Now, dogs do not pass into cats. I have seen, for instance, with a little overcrowding, continued fever grow up; and with a little more, typhoid fever; and with a little more, typhus, and all in the same ward or hut.

Would it not be far better, truer, and more practical, if we looked upon disease in this light (for diseases, as all experience shows, are adjectives, not noun-substantives):
- True nursing ignores infection, except to prevent it. Cleanliness and fresh air from open windows, with unremitting attention to the patient, are the only defence a true nurse either asks or needs.

- Wise and humane management of the patient is the best safeguard against infection. The greater part of nursing consists of preserving cleanliness.
- The specific disease doctrine is the grand refuge of weak, uncultured, unstable minds, such as now rule in the medical profession. There are no specific diseases; there are specific disease conditions.”

Florence Nightingale clearly understood the utter fallacy before 1860 than Pasteur did, either in 1878 or later!


 

Antoine Bechamp, was the main individual Pasteur stole liberally from, and he was the first to prove that the moulds accompanying fermentation were, or contained, living organisms, and could not be spontaneously generated but must be an outgrowth of some living organism carried in the air. This was six years before Pasteur came to the same conclusions. To go into detail here on Bechamp would constitute a book and not a blog, but do Google him.

Pasteur’s treatment for rabies and his anthrax serum were utter failures and frauds. It was Bechamp who discovered and expounded the theory of antisepsis, which Pasteur permitted to be ascribed to him. In his ‘Studies on Fermentation,’ Pasteur published a letter from a Surgeon, Lord Lister, in who claimed to have learned the principles of antisepsis from Pasteur. When Lister began his antiseptic operations, they were generally successful, but a few days later, his patients succumbed to carbolic acid or mercuric poisoning, so that it became a gruesome medical joke to say ‘The operation was successful, but the patient died.’

Lister eventually discovered on his own and after numerous patient death, that using high doses of carbolic acid, which, when placed upon an open wound or respired by a patient were lethal. By gradually reducing the quantity of carbolic acid or sublimate of mercury employed, until at last ‘ his operations were successful and the patients lived; Lister discovered what Bechamp espoused about the use of any but a very minute dose of carbolic acid. This was something the plagiarist Pasteur did not know.

Pasteur was full of ignorance and was a man who, for more than thirty years, official medicine has worshipped as a god. Instead of making progress in therapeutics, Allopathic medicine – outside of surgery – has regressed, and is more backward in preventative care than ever before in its history.

The Danger of inoculating the friendly poisoning

Dr J. Garth Wilkinson , once said “When a drug is administered by the mouth (and) in proceeding along the alimentary canal it encounters along its whole line a series of chemical laboratories, wherein it is analyzed, synthesized, and deleterious matter prepared for excretion, and finally excreted, or it may be ejected from the stomach, or overcome by an antidote.”

However, when nature’s first line of defense, the skin, is violated and the drug is inserted beneath the skin through a needle, nature’s line of defence is attacked through the back door, and rarely can anything be done to hinder or prevent the action of the drug, no matter how injurious, even fatal it may be. An evil or incompetent physician indeed cannot foresee this dangerous action enough to hinder it. Even pure water acts as a violent poison when injected into the blood stream. How much more dangerous is it then, to inject poisons into the blood stream? This simple knowledge shows that inoculation or vaccination should be regarded as elective poisoning.

The Germ Theory Fetish

Forcing inoculations on individuals by law is one of the worst excesses of a tyrannical ruling elite imaginable. This should be resisted.

The “germ theory” of disease assumptions have not been proven, are incapable of being proven, and those already published can be proven false. The basics of these unproven assumptions is the belief that all infectious and contagious disorders are caused by germs. Each disease having its own specific germ, which have existed in the air from the beginning of time, and even though the body is closed to these pathogen’s germs when in good health, “when the vitality is lowered the body becomes susceptible to their inroads.”

Over 60 years ago the famous English physician, Dr Charles Creighton, said in Jenner and Vaccination (1879): “The anti-vaccinationists have knocked the bottom out of a grotesque superstition.”

Today doctors will not willingly give up such a lucrative practice as the use of vaccinations so parents and the public must do something to stop this blood poisoning. What will you do? If you believe that the “germ theory” is a fraud then you must believe everything based on it is also fraudulent, and should be outlawed; including the use of decayed animal-pus concoctions, pus grown on the livers of deceased monkeys and chickens. 

Remember the definition of dis-ease from the previous post?  Well, disease is  nature’s attempt to eliminate waste, and unhealthy tissues brought on by improper lifestyle. By taking in plenty of fresh air, washing you body, brushing your teeth and getting copious amount of sunlight, exercise and sleep, and not indulging in overeating you will prevent “an enormous number of diseased conditions”. All of these suggestions leads to better health and longer life than you can get through injections of toxins.


 So to conclude my long winded thesis, germs are the by product of a sick body, they are the dead entities, confused with living bacterias, that are always pesent in a dis-eased body. Since germs cannot live in an healthy environment, science knows or should know that the false bill of sale given to the public is on the same level of using leeches to heal  a fever and condems us to that magical belief of the divinity of weak science.

 

My next post - The body the human temple – will thourougly delve into how your imbalance contribute to your illness.

2 responses

10 03 2009
mel

you are an idiot, “germs don’t cause disease”?!! Did you make it through highschool biology?

11 03 2009
blackmystory

mel…

Either you need to read the article again or I can point you to intelligent sources. Since you have made a point of questioning my intelligence and education, perhaps you can shed some light on the viability of the germs=disease concept. And the next time you come here calling me names, I won’t be as accommodating.

Home work for you son:

1- What is a germ?
2- What is a disease?
3- How are germs and disease connected?

Make it concise, site sources and links and come back to me.

Leave a comment