The breast are part of the anatomy of both the females and males. The unscientific approach is to name the females anatomy as breast, tits or other varied nomenclatures, while calling the men’s anatomy chest (?), unless you are an obese male then you have female breasts…now that’s an image that shouldn’t be in anyone’s mind. On the inside, a woman’s breast is made up of about 15-25 milk-producing sacs called milk glands, which are connected to milk ducts that converge inside the nipple. Tied to the females reproductive abilities, these breasts are designed to suckle infants as part of the whole pregnancy, reproductive thingy that….you know…nature designed for her.
The remainder of the internal breast is composed of fatty tissue and fibrous connective tissues that bind the breast together and give it shape. Excessive fattiness, due to the type of diets consumed in North America, will make the breast engorged and enlarged or even deflated like deflated water bottles, if a female doesn’t pay attention to her internal and external health. On the outside of the breast there are nipples. Nipples, like all other anatomical structures, vary in appearance from woman to woman. They may stick out prominently, they may have a flattened appearance, they may be set a bit deeper in the breast, or they can be inverted. Each nipple is supplied with many nerve endings, which make it particularly sensitive to touch. There are thin muscle fibers in nipples that enable them to become erect. The darker or melanated pigmented area around each nipple is called the areola (plural: areolae). The size and color of the areolae vary from woman to woman. This area can be seen as an extension of the skin of the nipple onto the breast. It contains many nerve fibers and muscle fibers that help the nipple to stiffen and become erect.
It is quite normal to have small bumps in the areola. These bumps are oil-producing glands that secrete a lubricant to make breast feeding easier. During pregnancy, the areolae darken and remain at least somewhat darker after pregnancy. Women’s breasts have three levels of significance: they can feed a baby; they can give erotic pleasure; and they play a large part in shaping a woman’s self-image. In response to sexual stimulation, a woman’s breasts may undergo changes. Her nipples typically become erect during sexual excitement. As excitement proceeds, the areolae begin to swell, continuing to the point where the earlier nipple erection may look less pronounced. The veins in the breast often become more visible as a result of the increased blood flowing into them, and, in women who have not breast-fed, there may also be a small increase in breast size.
According to past narratives, many non African males and even some who grew up in the western culture, the first significant and mature exposure to the female breast came from (1) viewing pornographic magazine (2) sneaking a peek at a cousin, sister or sister’s friend, or a national geographic periodical, which in previous years seemed to be fixated on older cultures in Africa and South America.
Like the face, a shapely pair of legs or a full pair of lips, the breasts can be an attractive part of a woman and is often a source of interests to both genders. Like all things the hue man is varied in his or her preferences of breasts, however, many often, because of the media conditioning tend to gravitate to larger breasts. Modern women are aware of this so they spend time, effort and money to enhance their breasts, which in turn enhances their egos and self esteem and through surgery or exercise they make them more appealing to men and intimidating to other women. Now while men do and are fascinated by a nice pair of breasts, they and many women have a false sense of what a nice pair of breasts is like. Many have fallen in love with the silicone enhanced plasticity or the overly large adipose infused mammary glands, both of which are signs of an unhealthy approach to breasts. The western (white) society has sexualized the breasts in the most extreme of ways and despite many women who claim to not like it, do partake of that sexualisation. In the western society many men feel that the breast are most appealing because of how they look, feel in your hands, your mouth, it makes a good head rests and feel nice when you squeeze them.
The female breast has been so sexualized that restaurants, car advertisements, even political campaigns have utilized the breasts in overt and subtle ways to sell or promote their objectives. According to Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution, and long before even he concluded the same, we subconsciously select partners who are healthy and appear capable of reproduction. This is why even today, women would look at Djimon Hounsu as a fine mating specimen as opposed to Bruce, Bruce the comedian. And why a man would look at a Serena Williams over some stick figure on a fashion runway who is this close to being a poster child for UNICEF. According to Darwin’s research, men are attracted to bosoms because they are indicative of a strong constitution and an ability to further propagate the species. Although reproduction is no longer a man’s top priority, this instinct remains despite centuries of evolution. Any good lover knows that a woman’s breasts are closely connected to her primary libido. Therefore, another reason a man likes breasts is because it is the key to bringing women to a state of heightened sexual arousal. As men we are highly visual creatures and require visual stimulation. It’s hardly surprising then that breasts, large or small, raised and perky as they often are, receive attention of men, often to obsessive state from some who lack maturity or control. After all the pair of breasts is a woman’s most well-defined physical feature. Humans are the only animals who include breast fondling as part of the mating process.
Men are attracted to a woman’s general appearance, but unfortunately for women in a breast obsessed society like the west, some males and females look down on smaller breasts, or for some macabre reasons look up at silicone enhanced monstrosities. A woman should never get breast implants to please a man. She’d be doing it for all the wrong reasons which are mostly physically unhealthy .When a woman has a man who loves her for who she is, she has no reason to worry about her breast size, so she can forget about breast implants. If a man can’t appreciate a woman for what she has to offer, believe me, he won’t respect the rest of her either.
But why are human breasts a sexual stimulant?
Men are wired to respond sexually to the female body. Much depends on the situation, circumstances and/or the relationship. Often it is the mystery of what he doesn’t see that makes the man even more attracted to her. Despite the trend in the western society, with how pornography has exploded tremendously over the past several decades, men find a totally naked woman less sexually attractive than one in partly revealing clothing. It is what is in the imagination that arouses. Men are allured by the shape of the female body, and curve of the breast and the symmetry of the face that entices us.
Sigmund “Fraud” described several stages that almost all newborns begin shortly after birth and the normal child has passed through all of them by about 5 years of age. Freud said that the personality is essentially formed at this point, assuming to interruption at one stage or the other.
The oral stage is the child’s first developmental stage, the child communicates through the mouth; they get food, pleasure, basic instinct development such as sucking, rooting and taste. If there is some interruption before the Oral stage reaches fruition, a fixation can develop and the male child will find manifestations in later life. Which may essentially explain the obssetion with breasts in a western society where, most women will refuse to breast feed…totally? This oral fixation tends to bring the obsessed back to a time in their life when they felt safe. Countless psychologist and psychiatrists have attempted to explain the relevance of breast feeding, while an equal amount of those from the same discipline will argue against breast feeding, stating that one can get an equal dose of nutritious smilax from a plastic bottle. The wise among us over stand that breast feeding a child is wealthy on several levels and goes a long way to initiate the child into a healthy state of being.
Whether one disagrees or not, no one has given an organic natural reason for NOT breast feeding. They have given social reasons, they have lied and stated that the child gets similar nutrition, but like everything else, if you throw shit up against the wall some will stick. Thus many women have opted not to breast feed for cosmetic or social reasons, based on arguments some male lab scientist created. The western society is a society that is schizophrenic on a lot of things, none more so than sex and sexuality. A society that is obsessed with breasts, also has a problem when the breast is in the mouth of a baby. Ho’s like lil Kim or Madonna can bare their breast while dancing or rapping, but someone like Jamie Lynne Grunet is an embarrassment and is being publicly lewd.
There is an articlke about Jamie Lynne Grumet: her fall out from that time magazine shoot and her response to that.
I am unsure of the “legality” in the US, but in Canada it is “legal” for a woman to breast feed in public. Yet there are numerous assholes and individuals with deep seated emotional dysfunctions that get upset when a woman pulls out her breast and start feeding her baby. Then again, there are also perverts that get sexually aroused by that, but thankfully, that shit is kept to themselves. Now I emphasised legal, because the world run by the Caucasian man supersedes natural, organic or “god given” for legality or rules created by man to control other men. Therefore women HAD to beg these women hating homosexuals to “legally” breast feed in public. In a society that is anti feminine, anti masculine and certainly anti family, is there a wonder when hospitals are encouraging women to suckle their children on artificial Monsanto induced poisons called similax (and similar cruds) over what is natural and organic for the child? Jamie Lynne Grumit is not the first and certainly will not be the last woman to be publically ridiculed and reviled because she attempted to do right for her baby AND right for her emotional and physical well being. It is interesting that all these bra burning feminist who exist to boast of their incredible success in being as fucked up as men trying to survive in a upside down society, will in turn give over the right to their mothering nature, to the science lab run by anti feminine men.
To see a woman breast feeding her child is the most beautiful and non sexual scene one could witness. It is paying homage to the creators design, reminding us of the connection of the mother to her child and the creator in her. Observing the baby has they suckle on the breast is to witness, trust, joy, reverence and a spiritual moment all rolled up into one. Yet in this society where the breast are sexualized, this is seen as a disgusting act, repulsive even. In a society where any ho can walk about with her tits hanging out and calling it cleavage, in a society where a woman’s body is abused visually and physically, where woman often misuse their body in a dysfunctional attempt to find that elusive love…we decry the most natural and loving evidence of the blessings of the creator…a mother suckling a baby. Never mind that in the western society, the prevailing image of its religious foundation is the mother and child. NO! The modern woman has become complicit in her oppression away from the breast as a birth of nurture into a place of revulsion. The sad part of this as an African man, is when so many knee-grow females refuse to suckle their babies for selfish reasons such as “it will drag my breasts down”, “it hurts” or the clincher…the baby takes to long or is too greedy.
Yet these same women will see no problem when a grown ass bitch ass man will climb all over the baby to get next to those same breast she is denying her child.
Now how ass backwards is that?