Taming the bull and other masculine things


“Those who have swords and know how to use them, but are determined to keep them sheathed, will inherit the world.”

How often have you head me mention the word gynocentric and gynocracy? Well, gynocracy is touted as a “government by a woman or a state in which women are legally capable of the supreme command”. A gynocracy is a system that is centered on or concerned exclusively with women; taking a female (or specifically a feminist) point of view, feelings and emotions exclusively above that of men. In other words gynocracy is the female antithesis to a patriarchy.  Both gynocracy and patriarchy is a construct of the European’s imbalanced mind set,  viewing a complimentary world from a competitive platform. In a world of gynocracy,  authentic masculinity is toxic. If toxicity is the quality of being poisonous and poisonous to any medium the poison encounters.  Modern western society always uses the term toxic masculinity to describe men who do not place feminism on a pedestal and bow down to feminism or women’s unaccountability. To them masculinity as our fore fathers practiced is, was and has always been bad for society. This is how  masculinity is defined by feminists’ and males who do not overstand what masculinity looks like or is…:toxic“.  Many choose to embrace gynocracy in a masculine phobic and normal phobic society as the solution to traditional male gender roles. The philosophy of gynocracy is to  “restrict the kinds of emotions allowable for boys and men to express themselves and instead promotes the idea of a social expectations that men seek to be dominant (the “alpha male”) and limit men’s emotional range primarily to expressions of all that is naturally male”.

Normal-phobe is a termed recently coined by an associate of mine, to describe the promosexual and homosexuals, who have been waging a propaganda war against heterosexuals who do not conscribe to or agree with shoving the homosexual lifestyle down the throats of heterosexual children and adults. Homosexuals and promosexuals ( those who may not be homosexuals, but promote and support it aggressively) have strong bias and antipathy to the position of masculinity and the position of men in modern western society.  These Normal – phobes demand that masculinity be sublimated and the mans natural nature be submissive to feminist and homosexual ideas, philosophy and behaviours.  Women have embraced being whores by challenging “men” not to slut shame, whores. Homosexuals complain that real men are prejudice because they would not “date” a male wearing a dress.  They go as far as saying that heterosexual men are this way because they run from their homosexual tendencies or feminine tendencies.

A 2014 survey released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that;

Based on the 2013 NHIS data [collected in 2013 from 34,557 adults aged 18 and over], 96.6% of adults identified as straight, 1.6% identified as gay or lesbian, and 0.7% identified as bisexual. The remaining 1.1% of adults identified as “something else[]” [0.2%,] stated “I don’t know the answer[]” [0.4%] or refused to provide an answer [0.6%].

More specifically, 1.8 percent of men self-identify as gay and 0.4 percent as bisexual, and 1.5 percent of women self-identify as lesbian and 0.9 percent as bisexual.  And while the percentage is very small in comparison to the over all population, the narrative is of an overwhelming force of homosexuals that are taking over the world. The overtaking of the world is a fantasy that those in power use to push a depopulation agenda, mainly on Afurakan people and other older cultures.  Where as homosexuality in general is an his-storicaly acceptable “normalcy” in European western society.  A “normalcy” that they have been pushing on Afuraka and Afurakan culture  since the first Caucasus-Asians invaded Kimit, as illegal immigrants. Homosexuality as this great force of social change is still not anything close to that. Most promosexuals are prisoners of the moment and get caught up in the narrative of masculine men oppressing homosexual men. And of masculine men oppressing women. This is how propaganda works. We buy into it and it becomes real.  Homosexuals have even gone so far as to coining a term, as far back as the 1980s….Heteronormative…which is described as denoting to or relating to a world view that promotes heterosexuality as the normal or preferred sexual orientation. Overstand that men or women engaging in homosexual behaviours over the millennium has always been seen as an anomaly than a norm in most societies that the west celebrate as supportive of this behaviour. This society has become a society that equal parts fear, denigrate or make mock of masculinity and manhood. Even while demanding men comply with the dictum of a gynocentric expectation.

Men have always praised women. Even in societies such as Greece and Rome, Chinar and even the Arabian peninsula….societies that are remarkably anti femininity.  Except for the Arab states, all these societies, including China and Japan, have had women deities and hero’s, leaders and powerful figures. The issue is not any man making a open declaration of love and committment to women. It is that he makes it on his own term, based on his criteria of manhood. It is that men do not go far enough in praising women for this infallible and perfect creature many think they should be seen as. The issue is how men AND women in a social media driven demand that a man puts him self out there and then laughs at his failure.  Note that we are not this monolithic entity called hue-manity that all think the same and behave the same. In the 20th-21st century, we have taken public humiliation to a depth it has never been recorded before.  Such as manspreading, man-splaining and other feminist clap trap, introduce to shame men for being men.  Patriarchy always made a show of publicly humiliate women, but also men.  Gynocracy will publicly strive to humiliate men and defend women’s own public failings as product of male behaviour of lack of.  And the best way to humiliate a man is to take his manhood, his proverbial “balls” and to reconstruct him as a psychological and emotional woman.  These men then become “safe”. So safe many boys are trained to be “female thinking males” instead of masculine thinking men. Note I said “female thinking” and not feminine.  A distinction because most female have lost their femininity. This is why transformers and descepticons can act like a female without the special essence that make them feminine females, while many females act as unfeminine as imaginable.

The narrative that any masculinity is a testosterone driven, frat boy behaviour is the stuff of hollyweird and social programming.  Hollyweird wouldn’t know what masculinity  is, and social programming removes the potential of a man protecting his family and woman,  only allowing it when males go off to die for “god” and “country”.  Manhood and masculinity is a solution to the lack of honor, spirit and leadership, lacking in todays society. The people in charge wants emasculated men, because through out the millennia, it is men who pose the most danger to dictators and powermongers.  Modern society has become a consumer society, which is highly feminine. It has moved away from a masculine society which is about building., manufacturing and creating nations and civilization.  Men should stop listening to women and other weak males on how  masculinity should look like.  Women can only tell you how she feel she should be treated by a man. A man must know how to treat a woman based on his masculine principles.  And men should never listen to emasculated males, because at least women are in their natural environment of wanting to be praised and adored. There is no excuse for a male to encourage an lack of masculinity except for the fact it cast a light on their own failures. One of the greatest attributes of masculinity and manhood, is the ability to overcome adversity. Adversity that challenges his position as a man, as a husband and as a father.  This inability to rise to the occasion is why women today, lament the lack of masculinity. Yet many of these same women would rather mate with a man they despise, a weak male and raise another weak male, as long a they are “loved” without conditions.  Many males would rather be the female in a relationship or be adored like a woman, instead of just doing what is right. Acting right! In order to know how to act, one must know what masculinity requires.  Masculinity requires a man to rise above his safe and comfortable space to achieve unexpected rewards.  To have, hold and exhibit integrity, courage in the face of adversity, strength in the face of difficulties and honor. Honor is a mythical unicorn in mansphere.  And mansphere is the space men hold that are uniquely theirs and theirs alone.  The lack of such a space kills his masculinity and forces him to become a shell of manhood.  Manhood is about taking risks. A man’s risk is often seen as dangerous and or stupid by people who do not overstand the need to push ones self and hone oneself to be the best version of oneself.

Part of being a man in a woman’s life is to ensure a woman doesn’t harm herself. He is to allow her some leeway to explore her boundaries, but be there to stop her from going to close to the edge of the cliff and falling over.  Which most women tends to do, because they always want to see more, always want to have more.  A tendency which conflicts with the need to be cautious. Part of being a woman in a man’s life is to support him in his adventures, even if she wants him to be safe. The difference is that a man HAS to be allowed go to the edge of his boundaries and explore it.  This is why man have died over the millennia doing things we now sing about and praise as courageous and ground breaking.  This is how men have been creating civilizations and great scientific and cultural discoveries since before time was counted. If you, the weak and emasculated males, can’t or won’t do it, get out of the way of those who want to and will.  Don’t be that man who listen to women to not be a man and don’t train your children…especially the boys…to live a life behind the apron string, while other boys grow up to be industry and cultural leaders.  Movers and shakers. High value men. And don’t jump on the band wagon when these act of manliness becomes the foundation of future civilization.

The movie clip below explains how man faces his short comings, leaves his safe space and realizes the inner bull that is  buried in too many males today.

Vincent is the symbol of the hyper masculine male that seem to make so many women wet becasue of his risky and high risk energy.  An energy without control or direction. Max is the classic beta male, who is trained to subvert his natural masculinity in order to make himself and make others around him, including women, feel “safe”.  The masculine man possess the high risk energy of Vincent with the temperance of Max, thus controlling the wild bull inside, only to release its fury or energy in and measured pace in order to build, provide and protect himself and for all around him. The bull inside the man…especially the Afurakan man…is constantly dulled and shrivelled up becasue of socialization from birth. This socialization extends to the education system, religious institution and the politicization of the “safe male” like Max, thus creating society of beta male or emasculated male in a time when masculinity is sorely needed. Instead we have the pseudo masculinity of hyper masculinity we see in the movies and the universal soldiers in entertainment and mercenaries  disguised as of “freedom fighters” for various colonizer government and corporate interests. Modern gynocritic society demand that men be gentlemen”, however being a gentleman is out right bullshit and debilitating! Everybody sees the word “gentle”, but they fail to realise that the prerequisite for being a gentleman is being a MAN!  A person eager to kill for his food, happy to kill to protect his family. When this base, barbaric man manages to restrain himself and learn when, and when not, to let go of the reins, only then does he earn the title of “gentleman”. First he has to earn the title of “man”.  When we think of “meek” ...as in the “meek shall inherit the world”…it basically means “be a cowardly, harmless little mouse”, we cannot think the same about someone determined to keep their swords sheathed.  Some people may try to focus on the fact that the sword stays in the sheath, are missing the big picture. The prerequisite of being determined to keep your sword sheathed is having a sword, carrying it every day, and being a determined, disciplined person. Meaning that when he sees something worth fighting for he automatically has a strong desire to go fight for it. And it doesn’t mean the sword actually stays in the sheath, just that the swordsman hopes the situation allows him to keep it there.

Sun Tzu’s position on the Sheathed Sword as an offensive strategy, focuses on knowledge of self and opposition, and the accomplishment of objectives by informed pre-positioning so as to minimize the need to engage in costly conflict.
The Importance Of knowledge, wisdom, and understanding is; “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.” The man who tames the wild bull…or allows the bull to emerged in a controlled fashion shows patience, positioning, and timing, because “To fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy’s resistance without fighting.” Thus the highest form of masculinity is to overcome situations and challenges. without a fight.  The next best is to prevent any situation to rise that would force him to choose to fight. While a lesser form of masculinity is to engage an individual or situation after the fact. And of course the worse is to become embroiled in useless and unnecessary physical or emotional distraction that detracts from your purpose. If the masculine man finds himself in engage in challenges that forces him to unleash the tamed bull, his reaction must never to be undertaken thoughtlessly or recklessly, but to preceded by measures designed to make it easy to win. Do it in the shortest possible time; At the least possible cost in lives and effort ( preferably yours and those who you care for); and do it while producing the fewest possible collateral damage. Finally the people who are dedicated and carry their swords every day, have the discipline and determination to preferably find another way to resolve things without using the sword, despite wanting to use the sword when they see evil in the world. These people who are wise enough to also know that sometimes the sword is the only way….they shall inherit the Earth.

 

Find your inner wild bull young man! And tame him!

See the source image

 

3 thoughts on “Taming the bull and other masculine things

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s