What and who is MGTOW: and its place as a social phenomenon, Pt 1


“Truth is consistent despite opinions!”akwesi Sankofa 

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win,” Ghandi

“This is your last chance. After this there is no turning back. You take the blue pill: the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill: you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.” – Morpheus, The Matrix
‘Red pill’ has become a popular phrase among cyberculture and signifies a free-thinking attitude, and a waking up from a “normal” life of sloth and ignorance. Red pills prefer the truth, no matter how gritty and painful it may be. “I took the red pill”

A social movement is a type of group action. There is no single consensus definition of what a social movement is. Social movements can be small or large, sometimes informal groupings of individuals or organizations which focus on specific political or social issues. In other words, they carry out, resist, or undo a social change.  Some social movement in the 20th and perhaps the 21st century, will go down as brief fads. Such a movement,  believe it or not, like this phenomena called flash mob, of which I have yet to overstand the sense in it, was popular for a minute. Social movements do speak eloquently of the modern society member’s need to belong to something, even for a New York minute. And even if such movement appears consternating. Other social movement are writ indelible in the mind and fabric of ourstory and his story,  and has long term impact on the lives of future generations. The Bolsheviks movement is one very famous movement that has practically controlled the lives of many on the planet. The sexual revolution is another. And perhaps,  equally as far reaching as the Bolsheviks revolution and what fueled the sexual revolution, is the women’s liberation movement. Or other wise known as feminism. Let it be known, if you are a student of history that the term feminism is a 20th century terminology, whose concept has been around since the dawn of Europe’s emergence from the fourth ice age. Yes! There has been four, of which we are at the vestiges of the last one. Global warming be damned.

For as long as they know themselves and for as long as they have interacted with older ethnic groups on the planet, especially those on the Afurakan continent, white women have sought to be treated as more than a brood mare or something just above a good horse or cattle in the minds of a majority of white men. Not to say all men of Europe did this, but numerous narratives, both written and spoken have addresses the imbalanced views and liberty that a majority of European males have had and taken, when dealing  with the European female. Once European women truly grew into their person-hood, they sought to be accepted and treated as equal in something and relevant in other things, in relations to the European male. Alas, just like anything the European puts his/her mind to, it becomes an exercise in extremes, over indulgence and the super imposition of one mode of thinking over another. This is a reflection of the deep seated and pathologically aggressive and competitive nature of the European mind and personality. What Dr. Bobby Wright termed, “the psychopathic personality”.  It was not enough to be free of the yolk or patriarchy or cave savagery. There is this incessant need to crush all opposition, even where there were or are none. Michael Bradley’s wonderfully insightful book, the Iceman’s inheritance details this phenomena of the white man’s psychopathic personality. Feminism took white women’s fight to be accepted as a full functioning part of western European society and made it a competition between men and women. Of all ethnicity.  Even in places across the globe, where women enjoyed a more favorable position in society than that of the European woman in her situation. Feminism’s success in co-opting the support of  women across the globe, in particular, the Afurakan women who were children of enslaved Afurakans in amurdikkka, lies in the fact that women have vaginal unity.  Unless the Afurakan woman is entrenched and grounded in in her natural Afurakan self, she could and have constantly been drawn into the struggles of white women against white men and made it a struggle against her own man. This was and is a part of vaginal unity that has little rational other than it being a women solidarity moment.

Feminists not only sought to be equal to men, but since the 1950s, have been promoting female superiority to men. Comments like men are defective women and if there were less men on the planet, things would be better. Or the musings of the founder of the women’s study program who envisioned a reduction of the male population to 13% as a good thing.  Overstand that such a notion as the sexual revolution and the women’s liberation’s extreme psychosis,  could not have gained any traction without the financial, political and legal support of men. Particularly the elite power mongers, who daily manipulate the sheeple members of society in order to maintain said elitist power. Then there is also the support from homosexual males, and pedophiles of both sexual orientation.  Many of whom reside in secret and who were, and are part of the modern power elite. This is how the sexual revolution became a separate yet integral part of the feminist movement. While the power brokers were playing GO, members of society was allowed or encouraged to play with themselves.

The City Council’s decision came in the wake of a $322,000 lawsuit filed by members of the feminist Free the Nipple movement, according to The Coloradoan.

In a time when child prostitution, child sex trafficking, pedophilia, child rape and molestation is running rampant across western countries, this is what feminists believe Is a fight that will diminish patriarchy. Go is an ancient Chinese board game of abstract strategy, in which the aim is to surround more territory than the opponent. taken territories with limited blood shed until the opponent is pinned into surrendering.  Since “women’s right” was entrenched into law, as part of the overall civil rights bill, more and more masculine territory has been eroded in a pincer like maneuver to supposedly eradicate patriarchy, but instead eliminate manhood and what was always considered as masculinity. The old saying “he who pays the piper calls the tune”,  is embellished in a sense by another saying that “history is written by winners”.  Feminism won, whether you sit on one side or the other. Women won concessions. Not so much through any hard fight, but through more and more concessions by males who sought appeasement and forgot how to be or choose not to be masculine. Then as Europeans and women in general, tend to do they wanted more. It was not enough to go after patriarchy, but to crush any semblance of patriarchy for good. Which means crushing it at the beginning middle and end. The entire planet knows and overstands that women as mothers are the first teachers. They are the most loved of our parents because in their natural state, they give balance and softness to men’s harder personality. That is when men are in a none patriarchal environment. Today women lead the charge in demonizing and emasculating boys in the beginning stages. They lead the charge in promoting sexual confusion in some false biological science called Gender dysphoria. Gender dysphoria is said to be a condition where a person experiences discomfort or distress because there’s a mismatch between their biological sex and gender identity. It’s sometimes known as gender incongruence. According to pseudo scientists, biological sex is assigned at birth, and depends on the appearance of the genitals, but gender is how you feel. Imagine your first teacher, the one parent you know loves you the most because she is the reason you are alive. Imagine that one person, telling you that though you have two scrotum sac and a penis, you are a girl and must dress, act and present yourself as a girl or you will disappoint her. Imagine taking this idiocy further by getting criminal doctors to chemically and surgically change your sons biologically outward appearance from a boy to a “not woman”. A deceptacon pr transformer if you will. Whether you initially buy into this gender confusing propaganda or not. Overstand that the majority of sex changes are from boys to girls. Overstand also that there is no such thing as a coincidence. Now imagine her being legally supported by the courts and by political legislation and backed by imprisonment of those who opposed this? They are also medically supported by the pseudo science called psychology. And socially supported by media and the food and drug industry in the form of massive amount of chemical laden foods that suppresses both the testosterone AND estrogen levels in the population. Effeminizing men and damaging female bodies. 

 

Dozens of feminists, many the first teachers of young boys,  fighting for “gender equality” marched topless through downtown Denver on Sunday – including one woman who brought her six-year-old son along.

In the middle stages, feminism in its relentless pursuit of superiority over men, sought the same rights as men, the benefits of both men AND women, but without the experiences or responsibilities of men. Under feminism women can get upset if a man opens a door for her, because in her feeble mind, he maybe trying to hit on her or see her as dependent on him. Under feminism women can demand a man take her out on a date, pay for everything and if he expects any form of compensation whether a kiss, sex or acknowledgment of them being an “item”, he is considered a horrible human being. Under feminism a man should not ask to go “Dutch” in any casual or committed relationship, even though she is a strong and independent woman, making as much or sometimes more money than him. And finally under feminism a woman who is equal to a man, enjoys the backing of family court in child support situations where the children is seen as exclusively hers and the man has to pay over and above what should be paid to upkeep the child or children. Whether the child is a baby, a toddler, a teenager or the child of another man she got through cheating, or even as a step parent. This extends to divorces where a man can build his financial empire, the woman can come in at the latter stages or contribute nothing to the building of the empire,  yet demands and get half of his entire estate. These three situations, divorce child support/ custody and dating/ marriage, is why MGTOW became a rising response to feminism and the obvious social and legal imbalance between men and women today. For awhile now I have sat back and read or listen to both sides of the narratives around MGTOW. Unlike most of the detractors I have actually sought out different and varied takes on MGTOW. And unlike most supporters I have logically eliminated the overly emotional continent and focused on the who, why when, where and how of the phenomena of MGTOW.  Just like feminism MGTOW is not new. It’s just that the terminologies is recent.  With the diminished role of men in society as leaders, builders and protectors of home and nation, many men went along with the changes, against their better instincts. Others trained and indoctrinated to be a woman’s pet, view woman as infallible, even if the don’t come out and say it, and support this perverted thing called feminism. But only a small few have initially fought and are fighting against the imbalance that feminism has wrought in society. That small few have grown exponentially. It’s inconceivable to think that changing patriarchy for gynocentricity is any form of progress.

When I was younger, I often read and listened to women chastise Afurakan men for separating themselves from women. A feminist attack on the science of men reserving a space for themselves. These feminist never addressed the fact that women had their own space that men couldn’t enter.  Today it is seen as therapeutic for women to have their own space in western society, but there is still a back lash when men do it unless regulated by society and women. I often tell the story of a time when black youth were constantly being harassed, beaten up and shot dead by police in my city. Of black youth acting out of pocket, delinquent and criminal. Many in the community accused black men of not taking charge of these black boys and set them straight. When a group of black men decide to have a men’s only meeting to take charge of their responsibility of protectors of the community, the meeting was invaded by women, lead by a notorious lesbian agitator. Suffice to say nothing was accomplished that day or since. And fortunately for me, I did not attend because I sense this wouldn’t go well, after hearing women speak on wanting to attend. A younger me would have gotten arrested for beaten somebody and I wasn’t prepared for that as I had a family to provide for. In a gynocracy, any attempt by men to reserve a space for themselves as men, absent the presence of and involvement of women is often met with derision, and insults about it being a group for homosexuals or women haters….which also translate into homosexuals in the minds of MGTOW’s detractors.

Men vs women a look at our baseline.

Women are what is called today hypergamists. Hypergamy is a new term, drawn from two ancient Greek words, that explains a woman’s natural inclination to marry,  date or sex upward socially or financially. Society for the longest time, has been made up of an artificial construct called class. Class is based on what is called your financial, educational or social market value. A man’s or woman’s market value relies on the amount for which something of intrinsic value, can be sold on a given market, bought on a given market or pursued on a given market. Women naturally being physically weaker than men, less logical than men, more emotionally driven than men, have always been regulated in most cases, to depend on men when it comes to clearing forests, fighting off predators and other men, marauding invaders and natural disasters,  in order to build nations and make a safe place in society for women. In order to do this men have to be more aggressive,  stronger, faster, more deadly and because of that more in control of his emotions. Thus the need to develop the ability to be more logical and rational than women. This is written in every mans DNA, even when we have become more urbane over the millennia. This is why all women are hypergamists as well, even when they don’t have to depend on men in the way their ancestors did. It’s in their DNA. The problem today is that feminism has created a condition that confuses women into thinking and acting as if she is equal in all things to men, yet still expect men to treat her in the best way men have always treated women. To be protected. To be adored. To romance. And to not treat her like a man. Like I said…confusing indeed. Because of this innate hypergamists instincts, coupled with their vaginal unity when dealing with men, all women tend to be feminists as well. The fact that ALL women are hypergamists, have vaginal unity and are feminists, does not say that ALL will necessarily take advantage of feminism and vaginal unity. More than a few women have resisted the herd mentality of vaginal unity and feminism, but all behave as hypergamists. At this point let me state that Hypergamy is not a bad thing. No! in fact its one of the best choices a woman has in this world. The problem is that most women are not properly trained to use hypergamy properly, because it struggles to gain foothold in a woman’s psyche in order to dislodge her emotionalism and vanity. It’s her emotionalism and vanity that makes her hypergamy distasteful and problematic to a growing number of men today.

So when MGTOW grew as an alternative to the dating, marriage, relationship game, women instead of logically look at the reasons, instead choose to be their natural self by attacking men or act confused as to why men don’t want to be around their female magnificence. Over the last few years, women have been writing a variety of articles on what they perceive as men’s problem with commitment. They listen to hustlers like Steve Harvey, Trent Shelton, Derrick Jax and numerous other snake oil sales men who blow air up women’s ass, to get likes, sell books or ingratiate themselves into women’s favor, or to get sex.

“Many women are confused and frustrated about men and dating….and they don’t know why. Here is my take on this malaise: At one time, men were the hunters and women were the gatherers. On an intuitive level, this essence is still alive today. However, since the advent of the sixties sexual revolution, American cultural standards have shifted. Men and women are exhibiting somewhat androgynous behavior.It is now becoming politically incorrect to make distinctions between men and women. Mind you, not everyone believes men and women are exactly the same, but some do. Thus, the distinctions between the sexes are blurred. America’s sexual revolution has created confusion about the relational roles between males and females. Consequently, there is a whole lot of friction going on in the world of dating. For example, in recent decades, women have begun hunting and gathering for the male, so to speak. Traditional romantic roles are going by the wayside. Society has inadvertently produced a new male prototype who has become adept at not putting in the time and effort to pursue a woman who truly interests him—the way men used to do. Such men are convinced that it is perfectly fine for him to be “a gatherer,” but the problem is, women are not natural “hunters.” Nevertheless, because women are ever the adapters, they have chosen to compensate for the rise of the culturally androgynous male, aka, the “male gatherer.”She has now assumed his previous role—that of protector and provider. Who is the male gatherer? He is the male who claims to have embraced equality, but who actually doesn’t respect women all that much. You’ve come across him. He is the guy who let’s the women come to him. He does not pursue women. He lives solely for his own pleasure. His take is, “If women want equal rights, let her prove herself to me.”

This is an excerpt from an article written by a female who goes by the name Yves, in April of this year. Yves’s article echo the increasing frustrations women have and have been having with men and dating in particular and men in general in a post feminist western society.  She further stated that “…yet sadly, women offer themselves up to the male gatherer, even though he has lost his instinct for honest romance and true commitment. Courting women isn’t part of the gatherers’ paradigm. He believes relationships should be easy and uncomplicated. Easy come, easy go. His expectations do not mirror the truth, which is that anything worth having requires time and effort to have. Thus, having experienced disappointment in dating for the umpteenth time, many women carry around a perpetual cloud of frustration and anger. Nevertheless, not wanting to appear passive, women continue the hunt”.

An aside: I could do a long ass post about the sections I put in bold, to show you my faithful followers how much these feminists’ and all supporters of feminism, including beta male providers, are so full of shit, their eyes are permanently “brown stained”. But let’s go over the bold points before further continuing to the body of my post.

  1. At one time, men were the hunters and women were the gatherers: Being a quote, hunter gatherer is part of the male psyche and characteristics. You know like other male characteristics, such as risk taking, testosterone leaden behaviours, running and smashing into things and playing sports and wanting to open doors for women. All recently murdered by feminists who insist that little boys should be like girls in their behaviours. Sit still in class, play with dolls, don’t climb and ride their bikes at full speed…or engage or watch contact sports. Certainly not open door for these independent and strong women.
  2. since the advent of the sixties sexual revolution, American cultural standards have shifted. Men and women are exhibiting somewhat androgynous behavior.It is now becoming politically incorrect to make distinctions between men and women. This point needs no explanation and it supports the first point above. If there is no distinction between the masculine and the feminine, do we really think this society can survive for long?
  3. in recent decades, women have begun hunting and gathering for the male, so to speak. Traditional romantic roles are going by the wayside. Society has inadvertently produced a new male prototype who has become adept at not putting in the time and effort to pursue a woman who truly interests him—the way men used to do.  There was no inadvertent result, but a deliberate removing of the mans role in society, the emasculation and feminizing of masculinity and manhood. When women claim that chivalry is dead or ask “where have all the good men have gone”, that’s because feminism killed chivalry and the loss of chastity buried being a gentleman in an unmarked grave.
  4. compensate for the rise of the culturally androgynous male, aka, the “male gatherer.”She has now assumed his previous role—that of protector and provider. if there was a true shift, women wouldn’t bitch and complain about there being no good men out there. Or men are not being men, protecting or providing for women. As I stated in my post Two Identical Things Can’t Occupy the Same Space, men are tired of being shamed, shunned and bashed for simply being men. At least most men anyways. Tell me how this compensation has worked for women’s mental health, emotional balance, heck even physical health? Ask a psychologist or a physician why don’t you?

“We have to go after guys,” they insist. “If we wait, nothing happens.” “What choice do we have?”

She concludes the above statement by saying…”Women who feel this way have a point, but their premise is wrong. She has another choice. She can let the man seek her. Here’s the thing. Women actually like having the man pursue her. His effort shows her he has a level of interest. She finds his pursuit of her hot and efficient – sort of like the engine of a BMW. But the gatherer guy….well…he lacks drive. He’s a Ford Pinto, or maybe a Volkswagen bus. The easy love thing works for him, but it isn’t working for her. Apparently, easy love isn’t so easy after all. Unwed mothers who struggle to raise their children without father’s know this better than anyone. Unfortunately, the children get the raw end of the deal….

You can read the rest of the article in the link. Why women are frustrated and confused about men

I conclude this part of this article by stating emphatically that I support the principles of MGTOW.  MGTOW is a philosophy and not a club or cult. There is no hierarchy because it is not a  monolithic entity. Men come to MGTOW to commiserate with men and share knowledge and experience with their issues in dating, in relationships, as parents and as victims of the diminishing of manhood. Like all platforms, you will have men who hate women, who hate a certain type of woman (as opposed to having preference for certain types of women, as is a man’s right…big difference), men who believe in pumping and dumping, men who are committed bachelors and men who seek answers in improving themselves so they can be better and more masculine men to women. There are cringe worthy name calling and absolute misogynistic rantings. But a majority of MGTOW men reject these men as weak and immature and have even opined that if a man wishes to marry or be in a relationship with a woman, to do so with the knowledge of who a woman is and what a man is. What the nature of the two are and to practice discipline and control of self first and foremost. You know what segment of men I have yet to see populate chat rooms and forums? Homosexuals. Which refutes the attacks by women and beta male simpanzees that MGTOW supporters are homosexuals. The second part of this post I will delve a little bit more into the attacks and misconception of MGTOW, and why MGTOW as a movement that is for this time, is such a problem for feminist minded women and feminine thinking men. But I will leave this post with a video that you will never see posted by MGTOW detractors.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s