Black male disposability

“It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men” – Fredrick Douglass

Disposability: Designed to be disposed of after use.

Based on ones lack of, or ones actually knowledge of basic military his-story, one should overstand that when a nation conquers another, the first things they do is kill the most able bodied. Those who were the fighters and those most apt to resist occupation further on in the occupation.

Note: In the FBI’s COINTELPRO (counter intelligence Program on Black Nationalist “Hate group” and racial intelligence 3/4/1968), the agency’s cross dressing director, Gay Edger Hoover put out a directive to all agents and departments. The infamous directive from Hoover detailed a concentrated efforts to “prevent the rise of a [Black] ‘messiah’” A “messiah” would have the power, according to document, to bring about “unity” and “coalition” among Black political groups. The document reveals a central purpose of COINTELPRO: to hinder the political actions of the radical Black American population. “In unity there is strength,” the document admits fearfully. Note also that the BOI, the former name of the 70 person strong FBI’s first director was Hoover, who’s first major task was created in the wake of the Honorable Marcus Garvey’s clarion call. The call was for the “negro” at the time to cast off the spell of “Americanism”, begging the oppressor for acceptance, instead seeking through self actualization and a do for self attitude and effort, which in turn would lead to a majority choosing to going back to the continent of Afuraka, to reclaim their stolen heritage.

Over time, conquering nations realize that devastating or eliminating whole societies in one genocidal shot, did not and does not align with the long term intention of occupation, when resources are aplenty. I mean, the occupying forces don’t want to work the fields, the mines, nor keep the infrastructure maintained. After all these are soldiers and soldiers are less equipped or less interested in being farmers, miners and infrastructure maintainers as occupiers. Not when they can utilize the sweat and blood of the conquered men, women and children. Usually after killing the men most likely to fight back, or those who didn’t die immediately on the battle field. The conquering army will then take those captured prisoners of war, or those weaker men and boys not part of the nations immediate defense, to the mines, where many would be worked. To death or not, is immaterial. There they’re to produce minerals to be shipped back home. They will send them to the fields, where they’re forced to produce agriculture and stocks for the occupying armies and to ship excess resources back “home”. They tried not to kill the artisans and trades men, for obvious reasons, because the infrastructure of the occupied land must remain as intact as possible. Further more the occupying forces will take the younger more attractive women to breed them, thus creating a buffer class of children, they can use against one side of the parentage. The Brutish and French imperialist have been and still do in conquered lands ruled over by the francophone and commonwealth rulership. Most of the time though, they will use these younger women, girls and even boys, for sexual gratification and abuse. As occupation goes, any colonizer overstands that using the conquered female population against the male population was a strategy for continual occupation to work. By setting the resentful men against the “favoured” women, takes the focus off of the real reason for their distressed position. The colonizers and imperialist.

In modern society in the west, the ruling government represents the majority population which are the Caucasians ethnic group. Their explicit intent is to make the majority population feel safe in their privileged fantasy of superiority, by ensuring that the occupied population i.e. the immigrants, the poorer class, the minority ethnic groups are set against each other, instead of focusing their ire on the ruling government and their oppressive policies. Across the globe, the Afurakan people on the continent and in the diaspora have always been an occupied group. In the west, people’s notion of occupation is still focused on the feudal or earlier period i.e., the Romans, Persians etc., when the occupation was more obvious and brutal. Lost on us these days is the sophisticated methodology of the Hegelian Dialectic, used to occupy people, place, things and concept in modern society. Hegelian Dialectic was first described by German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, and is a mechanism to arrive at a final truth or conclusion. Intelligent ( not intellectual) thinkers, commonly use the Aristotelian method for arriving at truth, which is to observe all the facts of the situation and then make the most logical conclusion based from those observations. The Hegel Dialectic explains a process where truth is instead arrived through the friction and conflict between one force (the thesis) and its opposite (the antithesis). The final result from that clash, the synthesis, is the best conclusion.

In all likelihood, the synthesis is not the final and absolute truth. It becomes the new thesis where a new antithesis forms to oppose it. The conflict between them leads to a second synthesis. This process repeats until the final synthesis is revealed, which theoretically is absolute truth. In plain terms, the Hegelian Dialectic is the battle of two extremes to get a result that is somewhere in the middle. That result will develop an opposing force of its own and the ensuing battle yields another result. Its a continual loop that is exhausting to follow, for normal people trying to lead a normal simple life. The objective reality we have right now has incorporated within it all previous “battles” of thesis and antithesis since the beginning of time, meaning that—according to the theory—we are living in a progressive arc to absolute truth and world perfection. In other words, defenders and practitioners of the Hegelian Dialectic, believe that truth is always evolving, never fixed. This is why today, we have nimrods and dufus’s proclaiming that gender is not fixed but fluid, based on how you “feel” and not on observational science of biology. Hegelian thinking affects our entire social and political structure. The Hegelian dialectic is the framework for guiding our thoughts and actions into conflicts that lead us to a predetermined solution. If we do not understand how the Hegelian dialectic shapes our perceptions of the world, then we do not know how we are helping to implement the vision. When we remain locked into dialectical thinking, we cannot see out of the box.

Note: A clear example of Hegelian Dialectic is the current plandemic, where a false report of a deadly airborne disease escaping from a Lab in China, to affect the entire planet. Ignoring the reality of distance travelled, air current that disperses pollutants over long distance or rain, which tends to also disperse pollutants. This is a disease, we now know was patented in amurdikkka, before 2020. And is such a deadly disease, that the constant fear mongering would have us believe that this deadly disease is equivalent to Ebola and the bubonic plague, and “could” devastate the whole planet. But we can stem the tide of this deadly disease, if people would scientifically “place a plastic mask over their mouth and nose, instead of putting on a hazmat suite” to stop it. Which is sooooo much better to prevent millions from dying from a deadly disease. Keep in mind the key word is AIRBORNE. Which means it gets into the mucus membranes via mouth, nose, EYES, ears, and the SKIN, which is the largest organ in the body. According to world governments and the planets current leader in the Eugenics movement, Bill Gates, the only final solution to slow or stop the deadly disease is to get vaccinated with untested and hastily created poisons that posses designers chips that forces itself pass the bodies natural defense system, in order to reorganize ones DNA. Thus “protecting us from this deadly disease”.

Hegel’s dialectic is the tool which manipulates us into a frenzied circular pattern of thought and action. Every time we fight for or defend against an ideology we are playing a necessary role in the elites game and it holds this system in place. Opting our consciousness out is the key. The chess board is a well known Hegelian symbol, the black and white squares symbolize control through duality in the grand game of life in all aspects. Left or right, white or black people, conservative or liberal, democrat or republican, Christian or Muslim and so on. Through two opposing parties control is gained as both parties reach the same destination, which is order through guided conflict or chaos. Left (thesis) versus right (antithesis) equals middle ground or control (synthesis). At the end of the day, the enslavement of people’s bodies via the enslavement of their emotions, is vital for propaganda to be effective, pre and post colonization.

The dualistic order out of the chaos model is based on separation of the people driven by economics. However, the planet is at the apex where consciousness is shifting and people are seeing beyond this game. Those manipulating the planet have used Hegelian dialectic to separate and control brothers and sisters, man and woman, husbands and wives and people of this planet. The only way to completely stop the privacy invasions, expanding domestic police powers, land grabs, wars against inanimate objects, covert actions, and outright assaults on individual liberty, is to step outside the dialectic and shift consciousness. This releases us from the limitations of controlled and guided thought. Hegel proposed his dialectic as a natural way of arriving at the truth, but had in mind that the nation itself was the vehicle to create new syntheses. Like most Enlightenment thinkers, he threw god away and made the nation-state god instead. The modern elite has taken this a step further by pre-determining a synthesis (a specific agenda) and then developing events that arrive at that synthesis through artificial means.

Below are a series of videos highlighting the Hegelian Dialectic as it is applied to the manufactured conflict between men and women in general, and black men and women specifically as occupied forces in the urban prisons of the north amurdikkka.

The lies that black women are the most educated, the largest number of entrepreneurs, the most successful member of the black community, has been debunked already, but because we don’t have the propaganda machine like the government does, we continue to hear and eventually believe the lies promoted to keep black men and women infighting instead of unifying

As someone who has been for decades, involved in community programs and projects, the idea of girls being more disadvantaged than boys, became a rising crescendo of anti male disparity, used to weaponize females and against males.

Even in my younger days, it was known, that black boys were assaulted often, by both men and women. If its a man doing the assault, many pretend it didn’t happen or minimize it, due to the shame of male sexual assault. If its a woman doing the assault, it is laughed off as a rights of passage and promoted as a favour shared between an older woman and a younger male.

It has come to the point where mothers themselves work against their sons and one of the biggest reasons why male mentorship and male authority figures are kept apart from well needed interaction that could create more valuable men, responsible and productive for any society.

Remember…”It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men”. However, for the doers of ISFET, the colonizers and imperialists, it is easier to birth defective males, in order to take away the protection and provision given to the women and future children. Thus ensuring a sort of Idiocracy of enslaved mules and donkeys. Sounds harsh me saying it doesn’t it? But is it the truth? Contrary to the Hegelian Dialectic, this is not my truth, this is universal truth and as such is very fixed. Until we can cast off the shackles and create another fixed truth.

Freedom is never Free, but it is very addictive.