The standards of Beauty

The Western Media has perpetuated a malicious propaganda campaign that includes strategic marketing and negative hype, this campaign is filled with lies perpetrated as truths, to systematically coerce the citizen sheep into subconsciously equating the beautiful images of Africa with being ugly unattractive and evil.  

  This subconsciously ingrained and patently false notion that use the word “black” or all African related characteristics as a negative thing are often direct at the female African (i.e. black bitch, black whore, nappy headed whore,  etc.). We are conditioned to believe that a woman with dark skin, full lips, high cheekbones, a high or large ass, or tightly helixed hair follicles as unattractive characteristics when they are attached to an African woman.   

  

Moreover, since African women don’t want to be ugly (black), they straighten their hair, bleach their skin, and some with extra money, chisel their facial features to effect a less Africoid look. The recent tragedy of Kanye West mother’s demise under cosmetic surgery is an example. According to the doctor, Jan Adams, quite a few African celebrities sought his expertise for rhinoplasti and had been on the Oprah Winfrey show in 2003, where he boasted of doing nose jobs for these celebrities.

 Doctor Adams said “the most common thing that Black celebrities came to him for is nose jobs, due to the inter mixing of the races and the unfortunate result of the noses not coming out [’right’]”.  Googling any references to Jan Adam on Oprah.com get this only this small note.  Many African people look for mates based on their lack of a prominent African features and hair texture so their children can have lighter skin and “good hair”.

 

Yet the phenomena of Anglo-Saxon women and even males going to the tanning beds to darken their skin is becoming so prevalent as to not even be an oddity.  In fact society has explained that phenomena away as just trying to look less pasty in the winter month without the accompanying association of trying to look African.  Many Anglo –Saxon women have also visited plastic surgeons to fatten their lips, cheekbones and butt cheeks. The new fashion trends of padded jeans and underwear, visiting salons to ‘perm’ (curl) their hair, and thanks to Bo Derrick getting braids and locks have all of a sudden become beautiful characteristics.

 

  In the White Supremacy system, beauty is a designate of Anglo-Saxon male and female and the media propaganda tells the African female that because she is African (black) she will always bee defined by this society as ugly when in her natural state.  White Supremacy defines long wavy fur as more attractive than tightly helixed hair as a reality. It defines dark brown eyes as less attractive than hazel or blue eyes, which according to iridology indicates high toxicity in the body. The system defines less melenated or light skin as more attractive than a more densely melenated or dark skin.

 

Doctor Carter G Woodson in his ground breaking thesis – the Mis-education of the negro- talks about the conditioning that cause us to go to the back door and build one without an invitation.  In the White Supremacy system beauty is characterized from a physical perspective. Through out all of this characterization, we never use the physical characteristics of the only woman that was actually the Original, the African Woman, as the true standard for physical beauty. Still beauty, in and of itself, is so much more than a physical attribute.

 

And although beauty is often said to be in the eye of the beholder, it’s not as subjective as one might assume.  I have heard an intelligent man when describing Anglo-Saxon facial beauty as one whose facial features are completely symmetric all parts on both sides of the central dividing line correspond perfectly or are identical to each other in shape, form and placement. All expected features are in place complimenting each other, working in harmonious concert as designed. In such a case the face has an ideal, complete structure and function, exact form, and is organizationally harmonious, and balanced – it is beautiful. 

 

 What the…hey now! I have never heard that description of African women…ever.  

 

Beauty in its fullness is manifested both from within and from without. The outside is a manifestation of what is inside and what is inside will eventually manifest itself outwardly. They are ultimately reflections of one another. For example a person who possesses physical beauty and has a beautiful disposition is truly beautiful, while a person who possesses physical beauty and has an ugly disposition is not truly beautiful. In the case of the latter, ideal structure and form may be present but ideal function and completeness is off- balance.

 

 We are naturally drawn to a woman who is naturally attractive, and we usually experience some type of internal sensory reaction from an encounter with them. Beauty impresses and gives pleasure to the mind and/or the senses. A few natural responses to an encounter with a beautiful woman are instant attraction and magnetism, passion and adoration, or relaxation and a state of stupefaction. An encounter with a beautiful woman is most pleasing to an observer in more than just the act of beholding; it can raise emotions and awaken the senses.

 

 Once we investigate further the object of perceived beauty, as explained by that intelligent man I alluded to above: ideal structure with exact function and form and organizationally harmonious, completeness and balanced , we then see the futility of trying to define beauty with out the complements of inside and outside.  

 

Addendum: It appears the link below has been confusing readers of this post because it appears that I am endorsing the women in it as my ideal standard of beauty. I placed it there to show how many people inside and outside of Holly Weird as the ideal images of beauty.

A view of Hollywood beauties:

http://images.google.ca/images?hl=en&q=hollywood+beauties&um=1&ie=UTF-8