Doctrines of false equivalencies

False equivalence is a type of cognitive bias or a flawed reasoning style. False equivalency means that you think (or are told) two things should have equal weight in your decision-making. If one opinion has solid data supporting it, but the other opinion is conjecture, they are not equivalent in quality. Consequently, a false comparison is a bad comparison or inconsistent comparison. which is when one compares one thing to another that is really not related, in order to make one thing look more or less desirable than it really is. Doctrine (from Latin: doctrina, meaning “teaching, instruction”) is a codification of beliefs or a body of teachings or instructions, taught principles or positions, as the essence of teachings in a given branch of knowledge or in a belief system. The etymological Greek analogue is “catechism”.

“Just because a cat has her kittens in the oven don’t make them biscuits.”

I first heard Malcolm X use that phrase over 30 years ago and it resonated with me in away that few other things did at the time. In Southern Ontario, Canada, straddling the cities of Hamilton and Cambridge, located 100 kilometers, west of Toronto, is a safari park and entertainment area called Canadian Lion Safari. It’s a popular theme park for locals and international visitors for years now. People all over come to see the wild animals, therein. The Canadian black spider monkeys, the Canadian Crowned Cranes, Canadian cheetahs, Canadian Baboons, Canadian Zeebu, Canadian Ostrich, Canadian Zebras, Wildebeest and Rhinos. What? What do you mean Baboons, Zebras, Cheetahs et el, are not Canadians? But many are born in this safari area and thus are Canadians? I am not sure what, and where you have a problem in overstanding this reality? These animals are surely Canadians and their offspring’s are the same. I am upset that some of you mother suckers have the balls to confront me, trying to argue that there is no such thing as a Canadian Lion Safari, but an AFRICAN LION SAFARI!

Are you confused? Do I sound confusing? Yeah! That’s how many of these kneegrows sound like, when they twist their mouth backwards, in stating that Afurakan amurdikkklans are NOT related to the mother continent called today, Afuraka (Afu-the under the hidden/world, Ra-the creator, Ka– the spirit), the spirit of the creator existing inside of me. These fools, have been for decades, pushing the false shit that kneegrows in amurdikkkla, are “indigenous American” and are thus not related to Afuraka.

It started with the Moor-ons, who choose to associate to themselves with the country of Morocco and even more foolishly with the ambiguous title of Moors. Now these people like to tell their adherents and sycophants to study. Yet in urging all within ear shot to do the study, they themselves failed in their own studies, to overstand that Moors was a name appended to a mercenary army of indigenous Afurakans, the offshoots of the amalgamation of Afurakans and European Turks, which many failed scholars falsely described as Arabs, straight up European Turks and an amalgams of Turks and Khazars. In other words, a Moor was originally a member of an army of mercenaries the various Emirs used as shock troops in spreading Islam. Over a period of time, it turned out that the best warriors were the authentic Afurakans, so they started populating their mercenary armies with more Afurakans, who were forced or volunteered to become Muslims. Thus by the time of they conquered Spain, most of the “new” Moorish army looked like members of he Bloods and Crips. The term Moor as it was applied back in that earlier period, was tantamount to calling members of today’s Black Water mercenaries a bunch of white terrorist’s, when they also had men and some women from a variety of ethnic groups, looking to get paid to be international thugs in disguised as a protection service. The sickness of denying association with Afuraka, continued with the A.D.O.S and F.B.A kneegrows who would rather associate themselves with this land and by extension the Caucasians, by claiming that they were as amurdikkklan as apple pie. Knowing full well that under the original and currently remade Constitution, they remain 3/5th of white human, these kneegrows lay claim to being original Indians. and As such are not Afurakans.

So many people with self esteem and self hating issues, took that warped ball and ran with it.

“Just because a cat has her kittens in the oven don’t make them biscuits.”

The need to exert superiority as “American”…above all other melanated people from the Afurakan Continent, the Caribbean and even those who emigrated to Europe is similar to those who became so black conscious that they walk around unnecessarily angry at white people and any black person that don’t view the world as tightly as they do. They are so “black Conscious”, some they walk around with a such fanatical gleam in their eyes, they turn off almost everybody the encounter. This is why most people who follow the Moor-ons, wax romantically about their “nationality” ( of being a Moor, even if they can’t find Morocco on the damn map) as opposed to overstanding the difference between Common Law and Civil Law. Public law and Private law. Which is why so many Moor-ons get in trouble with the judicial system. They think just saying this will make it so. Imagine bringing a god damn “Moorish Flag”, into a court room to floss on a judge, when they should have never gone there voluntarily in the first place. And if they did end up there under duress, should have been better served to either have their affidavit properly prepared or better still, refuse to contract with the judge as a private person. Nah! But most of you won’t get it.

Over the past two years, I am man enough to reevaluate what I think about the so called indigenous movement. Modified my stance to now say, yes, I see thorough evidence where Afurakans were on this part of the world before Christopher, came and Columbused the native population and land. There are enough physical evidence to indicate our presence here for far much longer than previously thought and not as enslaved people. There are also documentation, where many of us were reclassified as negros away from being called “Indians”. A term old terrorist like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Columbus used to describe the people, because they reminded him< Columbus, of another set the black skinned people on the other side of the world in the Hindus Cush Valley. Never the less, if the Moor-ons and the black Indians, claim that they don’t have any association with Afuraka, then where did they come form? Did these people who look like Antonio Moore of the A.D.O.S (American Descendants of Slaves) movement and Tariq Nasheed of the F.B.A (Foundational Black Americans) movement, really sprang up organically from the dust of this land? Why do we site books like they came before Columbus, as proof we were here before that lying thieving murderer, yet ignore the part where Afurakans were sailing across the Atlantic sea for thousands of years. From Afuraka? And what about both groups saying it strong and wrong that “they” weren’t slaves, because there are no current evidence of slave ships. Again, these mother suckers will point to “evidence” of a Noah’s Ark, which if you think about it, if the Arc did exist. Then Noah also existed and it would indeed explain the world wide flood that wiped out all of humanity. Except for four or five people on a tiny little boat, co occupied by predatory animals and their preys, including animals from both poles. These same four or five people will then proceed to repopulate the entire planet. That’s some serious super sperm and egg right there. They ask where are the slave ships? Conveniently ignoring, the documentation and images, from England, and from amurdikkka, as well as actual narratives of people born during the last days of that peculiar industry and their descendants.

False equivalence, false comparison and False Doctrines or in this case indoctrinations

Finally I have concluded that those nukkas who embrace this and similar theories, do so because they view Afuraka, through the eyes of National Geographic and World Vision. Their eyes are so blue, they forgot the original color was brown. I leave with you two videos of people promoting the black Indian theory. Check them out and then ask yourself…“Just because a cat has her kittens in the oven don’t make them biscuits.” and if a black mane lion is born in a Canadian theme park, does that make them Canadian Lions? Yeah! miss me with your cry in the wilderness for validation to a shit hole country and an imaginary identity. No wonder Marcus Garvey stated many of them ain’t shit here and wont be shit in Afuraka. One final note, if a continental Afurakan says Afurakans in amurdikkka are not related, which are fewer than those who do embrace us as family, rest assured you are talking to a continental equivalent of a ADOS/FBA type of colonized tribalist. Tribalist’s, like ADOS, FBA or similar, are the worst impediment to Afurakan unity. I mean, if you want to know how could brothers, fathers, sons and uncles would capture, daughters, sons, brothers and wives for enslavers? Well look no further.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s